The entitlement to 18 weeks unpaid leave was extended to up to the child’s 18th birthday on 5 April 2015.
Time off to attend Ante-Natal Appointments
Since 1 October 2014 fathers (and partners of pregnant women and those having children via surrogacy) have been entitled to time off work to attend two ante-natal appointments (each lasting up to 6½ hours). Employees must have a “qualifying relationship”, meaning:
If the employer requires it, the employee must provide a written declaration stating:
An employer has the right to refuse time off where it is reasonable to do so. If time off is unreasonably refused, employees can make a claim in the Employment Tribunal.
Adoption rights have been extended to those fostering for adoption. Since 5 April employees proposing to adopt have the right to take time off to attend up to 5 adoption meetings. The time off must be paid where the employee is adopting on their own. If the adoption is joint, one adopter is entitled to paid leave and the other unpaid leave.
Acas has published a new guide that explains leave rights for ante natal and adoption appointments.
Requests for Flexible Working
Since 30 June 2014 all employees with 26 weeks continuous service have the right to apply for flexible working and they no longer need a specific reason for making an application. On receipt of an application the employer must deal with the request in a reasonable manner and within three months from receipt of the request unless an extension is agreed. The prescribed procedure that applied to parents and carers has been abolished.
The following changes can be requested:
If the request is accepted this results in a permanent change and there is no right to revert back to the former working pattern.
The employer may still refuse based on the prior business reasons namely:-
There is no longer a statutory right to be accompanied at any meeting to discuss a request but it is good practice to offer. Similarly it is good practice to allow an employee to appeal against a refusal or part-refusal.
An employee has the right to complain to a Tribunal if the employer has not followed the right procedure or has rejected the application on a ground that is not a permissible reason or based on incorrect facts. The Tribunal can order the employer to reconsider the request and/or pay compensation of up to 8 weeks pay subject to the statutory cap.
Acas has published a Code of Practice and a guide on the right to request flexible working.
Shared Parental Leave (SPL)
Shared parental leave applies to children born or adopted after 5 April 2015 and replaces additional paternity leave. Mothers can still take their full entitlement of 52 weeks maternity leave and fathers can take basic paternity leave so SPL is optional and dependant on both parents working.
SPL is designed to give parents flexibility to share the care of their child in the first year. A mother can opt to end her maternity leave and pay after the 2 week period of compulsory maternity leave and exchange the remaining 50 weeks of leave for SPL which can be divided between the parents who take leave at different times or at the same time.
In addition the other parent must have:
Amount and Timing of SPL
Eligibility for Shared Parental Pay (SHPP)
Shortened Maternity Leave
Entitlement and Intention Notice
Employees must provide a non-binding notice of their entitlement and intention to take SPL including: both partners details, maternity leave taken, the balance remaining, the baby’s date of birth, how much SPL and ShPP each employee intends to take, a non-binding indication of when the employee plans to take SPL and a declaration from both partners that they qualify for and agree to the division of SPL/ShPP and agree to the data being processed.
The Acas Guide Shared Parental Leave suggests that on receipt of a notice of entitlement and intention to take SPL, it is good practice for the employer to seek an informal discussion about the employee’s plans to cover the proposed leave arrangements, what impact the employee’s absence will have on the business and what steps can be taken to mitigate this and whether any modification of the proposed pattern of leave to reduce the impact on the business might be agreeable to the employee.
Period of Leave (Booking) Notice
Varying a Period of Leave
An employee may submit a request to vary a period of leave in the following ways:
A variation will count towards one of the employee’s three period of leave unless:
Rights During SPL and Return to Work
The employer is entitled to make reasonable contact with an employee on SPL in the same way as during maternity leave.
An employee on SPL can, by agreement, work up to 20 days during any SPL period without losing their entitlement to SPL or ShPP. These days are referred to as “SPLIT” days and are in addition to any `keeping in touch` (KIT) days worked during maternity or adoption leave. Once an employee starts a period SPL any unused KIT days are lost.
An employee on SPL has the same rights and duties as an employee on maternity leave.
An employee returning from SPL is normally entitled to return to the same job if they are coming back from statutory leave including SPL of 26 weeks or less. If the period exceeds 26 weeks and it is not reasonably practicable to permit the employee to return to the same job, they are entitled to return to a suitable alternative.
While there have, to date, been no reported cases there has been plenty of commentary about potential risk areas. One issue that has arisen is whether it will be discriminatory not to offer enhanced ShPP if maternity pay is enhanced. The case of Shuter v Ford Motor Company Limited concerned a Claimant who claimed sex discrimination on the grounds that the company’s practice of offering women on maternity leave 100% of their basic pay for the duration of their maternity leave compared to his statutory additional paternity leave (APL) was discriminatory. The claims of direct and indirect discrimination failed, the Tribunal finding that the correct comparator would have been a female member of staff taking APL and not a mother taking maternity leave and (in the case of Ford’s male dominated workforce) the employer was justified in offering enhanced maternity pay in order to retain and increase the number of women in the workforce. Following the same argument, we do not believe the prospects of a successful direct sex discrimination challenge are high but query whether indirect discrimination could be justified in a more gender balanced workplace.
Other commentators have questioned whether there is any objection to enhancing ShPP for the first few months and then reverting to ShPP in order to encourage parents to return to work. What about making enhancements for the first period but not the second and third periods of SPL to encourage continuous leave? Again this may be an area for litigation but probably difficult to establish one gender would be more disadvantaged than the other. Organisations need to update their policies and consider whether they prefer staff to take short periods of discontinuous leave as easier to manage in the workforce than a lengthy period of SPL. Depending on their preference, it is worth considering steps to structure arrangements to minimise disruption.
+44 (0)20 8394 6483